Tuesday, November 06, 2007

The Controversial N Word

Last Friday the head of the English department at my school handed out a controversial article that was published in our local newspaper. The article is called 'Huckleberry Finn lesson plan prompts an uproar' and can be read here. The gist of it is that in an English class, as an introduction to Huckleberry Finn (a novel that already stirs the hornet's nest because of the n-word), the teacher, who was following a prescribed lesson plan that was put together by a district committee and 'consultant', wrote the n word on the board among other words in an effort to discuss the changing connotations of words. I will assume that good intentions were at play here, though I do not know the teacher personally. A student took offense to the n word (on the board) and though he asked the teacher to remove the word, she refused. The outcome is that the teacher is now in the midst of a storm of controversy. Though she has apologized to the boy and his family (as has the school district) the offended and his family have asked that she submit a written apology letter, do community service in an African American/Muslim neighborhood, and that the district ban the book from its curriculum.

OK. First of all, I taught Huck Finn when I taught junior literature because it is part of the required curriculum in our district so I know what it's like to feel completely torn about how to address the sensitive subject that is the n-word. I remember really fretting about it because I have also been the accused teacher (for a different and bogus reason) and I understand the power that one student who hates you can wield over your career. I chose to say the word while reading the book. I spoke with my students beforehand and told them that if they were uncomfortable saying it out loud that they didn't have to. I wanted to say it because: #1 I think censorship in literature is bullshit and #2 I knew that after the initial shock of hearing the word, it would eventually loose its power which is a really good thing. I made it though two years of teaching Huck Finn without any complication.

Secondly, if the district is going to put a teacher in a situation where they HAVE to teach something controversial, then they need to back that teacher 100%, no questions asked. We deserve this as professionals and as human beings. Because districts continue to hang us out to dry in an effort to appease parents, we have NO respect and NO authority in our classrooms or in our communities. If you don't think we have kids' best interests at heart, then either fire us and hire someone you do trust, or don't hire us in the first place. I'm sick of the equivocating.

Lastly, Huck Finn, though sensitive in print, is a classic, wonderful novel. It is a glimpse into history and yes, it contains racism, as did our society at that time. Just because it doesn't sit well with folks, doesn't mean it should be banned. In fact it is an uncomfortable read which, in my opinion, means that we ought to read it. It gives clarity to our own personal distaste of racism, and for some may hold up a huge mirror to their souls, perhaps allowing them to see an ugly blemish that needs to be addressed. Literature often holds up this sort of mirror - on purpose- and we are asked to experience a world that is challenging to our comfort zones.

Maybe Huck Finn is not a good match for reactionary high school students. And if this is true, then what can they read? Not Shakespeare - he's far too bawdy. Not Chaucer for the same reason. Not Orwell - he goes against the government and sometimes talks about sex. Not Milton or Dante - they actually address heaven, hell, and (gasp) God! In Steinbeck you might have to talk about a mentally challenged person who gets shot in the head, and in Dickens, the supernatural. Where do we draw the line?

If the student had actually read the book, he would know that in the end there is redemption for the slave, Jim, in that he is freed. In fact there are lots of instances in the book where Jim is more cunning than Huck and acts as the voice of reason. This is only one of the MANY aspects of the novel that should be addressed in the classroom.

Was the teacher wrong for introducing the lesson in this way? I don't know. I wasn't there, but I do know she was doing what the district wanted her to do. Is the community wrong for asking for the book to be banned? YES. Absolutely! In fact, I challenge that community to go and do something that is productive, not destructive. Maybe they should go read a book.

12 comments:

Jen said...

I agree the district should back up the teacher! The school I work at has overly active parents!! They practically run the school and yes there are many benefits that come with such high parental involvement but when admin is too scared to back us up it is just plain wrong!!

I hope the teacher in the situation doesn't have to do community service (oh that in it's self baffles me!) and "Huck Finn" is kept in the curriculum!

Deidra said...

We have talked about this type of situation in the class I am currently taking. It is stuff like this that really discourages people from wanting to teach or continue teaching. You would think that the district would be behind her a hundred and ten percent and if they weren't and it were me I would go down in flames fighting for my rights as a teacher.

Christine said...

YES. And Amen to your third paragraph.

Chelle said...

If all books that contained a controversial topic were banned, we would be left reading the comics. When I was teaching, the controversy in books led to amazing discussions and an opportunity to shed light on topics no one else will discuss with kids. And you are right, the district, school, community, everyone should support teachers more. Too afraid to stand up for what is right. How sad that it's easier to let a teacher get hammered than to support him or her and help educate the irate family.

choral_composer said...

PReach it sister!!!

Lisa (the girls' moma) said...

Yeah, the lack of support for the teacher is really bothering me. Fortunately had this happen when I taught in IL I am SURE I would have been supported. I miss that school!

There was a kid when I was teaching whose mother refused to let him read one of the books in American Lit. He wasn't in my class so I don't remember which book. Scarlet Letter? Catcher in the Rye? Probably To Kill a Mockingbird, actually. Anyway, that teacher and I had the same talk -- if you would actually READ the book, you'd see that there is redemption in it, that the very problems you are having with it are examined and discussed and dealt with.

My biggest HUGEST pet peeve is when people take offense to a book they've NEVER EVEN READ.

I too disagree with banning books, although I would never say that there aren't books out there I'd rather the girls not read until they are "ready." But heck if I'm going to judge the book without reading it.

Thanks for writing about this today.

I emailed you back! heheheheheheehhe

Ginger said...

AMEN to what you all said! And thanks for having my back - even if I did sound a little bit rant-y.

I have a feeling that one day I'll fight the good fight and find myself in the unemployment line. I'm starting to really not be tolerant of bullshit - which is bad because there is a lot of it in this world..

Oh well.
:)

Neal Locke said...

Usually when you post something about being a teacher, it makes me miss teaching. Not this time. I'm amazed when I look back at what I got away with -- Of Mice and Men is actually one of Steinbeck's more tame novels. I taught East of Eden: in addition to all the language, Steinbeck devotes an entire chapter to the positive benefits of prostitution to society.

Actually, though, I think censorship and linguistic angst have more to do with the geographical demographics than anything else. Five years in Oak Cliff, and I never had a parent challenge my often controversial choice of literature or words. Two years as a youth director in Suburbia (Frisco) and my church flies into a frenzy, forcing me to censor my own personal blog because I used the word "masturbation" metaphorically in a post about church life.

It's just ironic that for once I can identify -- but as a youth director rather than as a teacher.

Ginger said...

I certainly agree about the whole geographical idea about censorship. That's why the Brits laughed at Texas this summer at my Oxford inservice. "Texas probably can't teach that book."

And they're right.

Also, I thought the masterbation metaphor was genius!

DOWN with Censorship!

Erin said...

A nearby high school has been having trouble with the "people in charge" allowing them to use the n-word in the play "To Kill a Mockingbird". They wanted to present the play in its original form, which I think they should. There was all kinds of controversy over this and finally the principal, of all people, agreed to let the kids present the play in its original form, no censoring. And I heard they did a wonderful job, since the play doesn't center around that word. It just happens to be a word people used more freely in that time period. Censoring the written word is a dangerous thing to do. Let people figure it out for themselves if they're offended or not; don't do it for them.

Ginger said...

I'm glad that the production was successful! I was talking to a colleague the other day and she had to come up with an alternative assignment for a student for that very book for the same reason that the people wanted to censor the play. How sad that that student missed out on a wonderful classic!

I completely agree with the idea that people should get a vote on whether or not something offends them. The problem is that sometimes folks don't give things a chance. For example, I know several who won't read Harry Potter because it's "satanic" for all of the "witchcraft" in it. And they've made up their minds before opening the book. I.e. someone (probably a church official) told them to hate the book. The chance for HP to be offensive or not offensive was pre-determined for them.

I guess the question becomes, how do we steer away from our sheep-like tendencies and black and white value systems long enough to give ourselves the chance to figure things out? I mean, it's WAY easier to just have the same opinion as the guy standing next to you. You know?

Katie Wood said...

This evening, I had been searching the Internet for ways to deal with teaching To Kill a Mockingbird while coping with the "N" Word. I taught Huck Finn last year and had no trouble in using the word and avoiding censorship, but I've already had a student this year accuse me of being racist for correcting his behavior. After that, I became much more aware of the obstacles I may face in teaching this book. I loved your post, and you have reaffirmed my intent not to force censorship of the word as we read.

Looking through other posts of yours, I'm glad to see I'm not the only teacher who's quickly becoming fed up with bending over backward to accommodate parent complaints and worrying whether or not the administration will back their teachers.

Right on!